Secretary of State John Kerry
and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov of Russia, right, shook hands on
Saturday after making statements following meetings regarding Syria in
Geneva.
GENEVA — The United States and Russia reached a sweeping agreement on
Saturday that called for Syria’s arsenal of chemical weapons to be
removed or destroyed by the middle of 2014 and indefinitely stalled the
prospect of American airstrikes.
The joint announcement, on the third day of intensive talks in Geneva,
also set the stage for one of the most challenging undertakings in the
history of arms control.
“This situation has no precedent,” said Amy E. Smithson, an expert on chemical weapons at the
James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies.
“They are cramming what would probably be five or six years’ worth of
work into a period of several months, and they are undertaking this in
an extremely difficult security environment due to the ongoing civil
war.”
Although the agreement explicitly includes the United Nations Security
Council for the first time in determining possible international action
in Syria, Russia has maintained its opposition to any military action.
But George Little, the Pentagon press secretary, emphasized that the
possibility of unilateral American military force was still on the
table. “We haven’t made any changes to our force posture to this point,”
Mr. Little said. “The credible threat of military force has been key to
driving diplomatic progress, and it’s important that the Assad regime
lives up to its obligations under the framework agreement.”
In Syria, the state news agency, SANA, voiced cautious approval of the
Russian and American deal, calling it “a starting point,” though the
government issued no immediate statement about its willingness to
implement the agreement.
In any case, the deal was at least a temporary reprieve for President
Bashar al-Assad and his Syrian government, and it formally placed
international decision-making about Syria into the purview of Russia,
one of Mr. Assad’s staunchest supporters and military suppliers.
That reality was bitterly seized on by the fractured Syrian rebel
forces, most of which have pleaded for American airstrikes. Gen. Salim
Idris, the head of the Western-backed rebels’ nominal military command,
the
Supreme Military Council, denounced the initiative.
“All of this initiative does not interest us. Russia is a partner with
the regime in killing the Syrian people,” he told reporters in Istanbul.
“A crime against humanity has been committed, and there is not any
mention of accountability.”
An immediate test of the viability of the accord will come within a
week, when the Syrian government is to provide a “comprehensive listing”
of its chemical arsenal. That list is to include the types and
quantities of Syria’s poison gas, the chemical munitions it possesses,
and the location of its storage, production and research sites.
“The real final responsibility here is Syrian,” a senior Obama administration official said of the deal.
Speaking at a joint news conference with his Russian counterpart,
Secretary of State John Kerry said that “if fully implemented, this
framework can provide greater protection and security to the world.”
If Mr. Assad fails to comply with the agreement, the issue would be
referred to the United Nations Security Council, where the violations
would be taken up under Chapter VII of the
United Nations Charter, which authorizes punitive action, Mr. Kerry said.
Foreign Minister Sergey V. Lavrov of Russia made clear that his country,
which wields a veto in the Security Council, had not withdrawn its
objections to the use of force.
If the Russians objected to punishing Syrian noncompliance with military
action, however, the United States would still have the option of
acting without the Security Council’s approval. “If diplomacy fails, the
United States remains prepared to act,” President Obama said in a
statement.
The issue of removing Syria’s chemical arms broke into the open on
Monday when Mr. Kerry, at a news conference in London, posed the
question of whether Mr. Assad could rapidly be disarmed, only to state
that he did not see how it could be done.
Less than a week later, what once seemed impossible has become a plan —
one that will depend on Mr. Assad’s cooperation and that will need to be
put in place in the middle of a fierce conflict.
To reach the agreement, arms control officials on both sides worked into
the night, a process that recalled treaty negotiations during the cold
war.
Mr. Kerry and Mr. Lavrov held a marathon series of meetings on Friday,
including a session that ended at midnight. On Saturday morning, the two
sides reconvened with their arms control experts on the hotel pool deck
as they pored over the text of the agreement.